The Photojojo iPhone SLR Mount
Thursday, July 7, 2011 at 9:08PM |
Glyn Evans
Yes, this really is for real. Photojojo, the photography accessories specialists, have just released an SLR to iPhone lens mount. Designed for Canon or Nikon lenses, this accessory lets you mount you SLR lens of choice to either your iPhone 4 or iPhone 3, but this does come at a price!!

Below if the iPhone SLR Mount description, from the Photojojo online store.
"Ever since the iPhone camera was invented, it's aspired to be what it simply never quite could be: a DSLR. Sure, apps have helped your camera phone inch forward with simulated focusing F-X and faux filters.
Faux no more. The iPhone SLR Mount gives you the real thing. It'll set your phone photos apart from everyone else's on Instagram in an unprecedented way (#nofilters!).
This case-adapter combo lets you mount your Canon EOS or Nikon SLR lenses to your iPhone 4 giving your phone powerful depth of field and manual focus.
Telephoto, wide angle, macro, or your fixed fifty lenses all attach to this mount giving you a full range of lenses at your iPhone lovin' fingertips. Heck, you could even throw on a Diana adapter!
Plus, you'll be putting the SLR lenses you already have to use with the camera you use the most -- your phone.
Two loopholes on each end of the case let you tie on a camera strap, so you can hang it around your neck just like your real DSLR.
Now that your favorite camera has it all, what're you going to do with your DSLR?"
This iPhone SLR Mount is available from Photojojo priced at $249.00 USD for the iPhone 4 version, or $190.00 USD for the iPhone 3 version, with either Canon or Nikon mount.
Photojojo,
iPhone SLR Mount in
Hardware 
































Reader Comments (16)
This might work with a small 50mm for really shallow DOF shots, but I think you'd end up having to manually focus within a somewhat close range and then have to move the whole iPhone/lens contraption back and forth to finalize.
If it were $20 I might play with it. I have a load of EOS lenses no longer being used. But $250 is really crazy.
For the "fun" it is to expensive.
I have two Panasonic micro four thirds camera bodies a GH2 and GF1 the later one being pocket able at a push with the f1.7 pancake lens so why I would want to stick a large lens on my iphone and make it both larger and heavier completely baffles me - not to mention the price!
When i'm on the road for some days for example i'm happy to do the image processing on the phone itself. I don't need to carry any kind of computer with me. Why should i forego the better DOF in this situation? Why should i forego the option to zoom optically? :-)
Editing on the spot is great but I can always get an iPad with camera kit for that if I was itching to do so.
I will save the 200 dollars for my next body or lens and keep snapping with my iPhone for the spontaneity I love it to have! I will explore with loupes and other external devices to create different effects, but I want the two worlds of my photography life to remain separate.
Like I said I'd use my micro four thirds which gives me great bokeh with the f1.7 lens. Also lets not forget that the images are more than double the iPhone's at 12 megapixels. For image processing I can either export them to the iPhone to use the apps or use Photoshop. The point is I could have the GF1 and pancake lens in one jacket pocket and my iPhone in another. For the best IQ I would always reach for the GF1, shoot in RAW and process later at leisure. Unless I'm going out with the strict intention of taking pictures I would generally use my iPhone as it is always with me, but on these occasions I would not want to carry around a bulky, heavy lens with me. I'm not a fan of zoom lenses - though I do own 2 as they are too slow. Most people could if they tried do the bulk of their photography with either a 35mm or 50mm lens - look at what Cartier Bresson produced.
While a part of me wants to be thrilled with this, in reality I'd never use it. I'd just shoot w/my DSLR and move the files over to the iPhone or iPad. Far less unwieldy than this overpriced frivilosity. Maybe when the $19.95 cheap eBay Chinese knockoff becomes available I'll give in & try it, but even still I don't expect to ever really want this.
I can see a metric f-ton of Instagram users whose pants are beshatted now though. Sooooooo many Instagram pix initially shot with a DSLR over an iPhone. Now they can just skip that step and be on their merry way. To each their own, I guess...
On the flipside, the camera on the iPhone works in those situations without the need for an SLR lens.